Why Doesn't My Ring Fit My Rail?

by
posted on March 9, 2014
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
diy2015_fs.jpg

A common frustration encountered when setting up a scope on a firearm is the realization that those brand-new rings you just bought won’t clamp onto the rail on your gun. Without getting into the nuances of the Picatinny rail’s military-specified dimensions-developed to ensure that optics and other accessories will fit the various guns in use by troops in countries who adhere to that standard-simply remember that its cross slots are typically wider (0.206") than those on commercial Weaver-style rails (0.180").

So, a true Picatinny-spec ring’s recoil lug will likely be too wide to fit into a Weaver rail’s cross slot; but, since both rails’ outer profiles are usually close to the same dimension, Weaver rings will usually fit onto a Picatinny rail. This is all assuming, of course, that the maker of the rings and rails pays any attention to either set of specifications. Regardless, there will just be a bit more "slop" between the recoil lugs of Weaver-spec rings and a Picatinny rail’s slots than if the latter were fitted with Picatinny-spec rings.

And that brings up another point: When assembling the scope and rings onto the rail for the purpose of adjusting eye relief and making the horizontal and vertical stadia lines level and plumb, respectively, determine where you want the rings to be under the scope and go ahead and tighten their bases to their respective cross slots-first taking out all the play by pushing them as far toward the muzzle as possible. (That’s where recoil forces will tend to make them migrate anyway as the gun recoils.) Once the ring bases are snug, finish moving the scope fore and aft or leveling the reticle, then snug down the rings’ top caps.

Now, if the scope and rings move, they will do so as a unit, with the rings’ recoil lugs abutting the front of their cross slots simultaneously. That should ensure that, under recoil, they will share the load of recoil. It also makes re-attaching the scope to the rail a more consistent proposition, given that you remember to push it forward before tightening the clamping nuts or levers. This is especially useful when mounting and remounting an optic using quick-release rings, and it should become a habit.

Latest

Wilson Combat Bulwark 01
Wilson Combat Bulwark 01

Beyond the 1911: Wilson Combat's New Bulwark

The Bulwark is designed as a “hard-use service pistol” that combines the best features of a 1911 with those of a daily-carry duty gun, and Wilson Combat delivers it all at a price point below Wilson’s traditional handgun offerings.

Rifleman Review: Walther Arms PDP Pro-X PMM

Recently, Walther Arms has combined several PDP feature sets with a Parker Mountain Machine compensator to produce the Pro-X PMM.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) just opened an investigation to “determine whether Philadelphia Police use a vague ‘good cause’ standard to cancel permits to carry legal firearms.”

Review: Smith & Wesson M&P FPC 5.7

Having more guns chambered in 5.7 mm is a great thing, and the Smith & Wesson M&P FPC 5.7 is a welcome addition to the growing world of 5.7 mm firearms.

Ruger Moves HQ to North Carolina

Ruger quietly relocated its corporate headquarters from Southport, Conn., to Mayodan, N.C., marking the end of the company's management presence in the town where it was founded in 1949.

Honest EDC: A Realistic Assessment of Your Concealed Carry Kit

The problem is not that most concealed-carry loadouts are bad. The problem is that most concealed-carry kits are never re-examined against reality.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.