Supreme Court Overturns Bump Stock Ban

by
posted on June 14, 2024
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Bumps

In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a standing ban on bump stocks is unlawful. In a majority opinion delivered by Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, the court ruled that a “...semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a ‘machinegun’ because it does not fire more than one shot ‘by a single function of the trigger.’”

“The Supreme Court has properly restrained executive branch agencies to their role of enforcing, and not making, the law,” said NRA-ILA Executive Director Randy Kozuch. “This decision will be pivotal to NRA’s future challenges of ATF regulations.”

The National Rifle Association supported the case with an amicus curiae, or friend of the court, brief in Garland v. Cargill, a case where respondent Michael Cargill had purchased two bump stocks several months before the ATF published a final rule that amended the regulatory definition of “machinegun” to include bump stocks by adding the language: “The term ‘machine gun’ includes bump-stock devices, i.e., devices that allow a semiautomatic firearm to shoot more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger by harnessing the recoil energy of the semi-automatic firearm to which it is affixed so that the trigger resets and continues firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter.”

The final rule determined that owners of bump stocks had to divest themselves of the accessories by the effective date of March 26, 2019. On March 25, 2019, Cargill surrendered his bump stocks to the ATF, and on the same day, he filed suit in the Western District of Texas to challenge the rule. A bench trial ruled in favor of the ATF’s final rule, a judgement affirmed by a three-judge panel United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Following an additional argument, the en banc court reversed and remanded the judgement.

In April 2023, Attorney General Merrick Garland petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was granted on November 3. Oral arguments were heard on Feb. 28, 2024.

Latest

3. Censord
3. Censord

How the Mainstream Media is Changing on Guns

Given the record low public trust in mass media, what is its future, and is there any chance market forces could make its treatment of the Second Amendment fairer?

Number of New Suppressor Makers Increasing Rapidly

Companies that traditionally did not offer suppressors are adding them to their lineups at a scalding pace—including some major leaguers.

First Look: Steiner ATLAS Aiming & Illumination System

The Steiner ATLAS (Advanced Tactical Laser Aiming System) is a comprehensive, rifle-mounted aiming and illumination system in a lightweight magnesium-alloy body.

Heckler & Koch VP9CC: The VP9 Goes Micro-Compact

Based on the company's popular striker-fired VP9 platform, the new Heckler & Koch VP9CC takes the features of the full-size original and shrinks them into a micro-compact package for concealed-carry use.

The "Frenchified" BAR: France's FM 24/29 LMG

Following World War I, the French military considered adopting the Browning Automatic Rifle, but cost considerations and national pride forced the development of a domestic design: the FM 24/29 LMG.

How Money Turned the Mainstream Media Against Our Freedom

Major changes in the American media landscape have thus far, and in general, contributed to a more partisan treatment of the Second Amendment.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.