Supreme Court Overturns Bump Stock Ban

by
posted on June 14, 2024
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
Bumps

In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a standing ban on bump stocks is unlawful. In a majority opinion delivered by Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, the court ruled that a “...semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a ‘machinegun’ because it does not fire more than one shot ‘by a single function of the trigger.’”

“The Supreme Court has properly restrained executive branch agencies to their role of enforcing, and not making, the law,” said NRA-ILA Executive Director Randy Kozuch. “This decision will be pivotal to NRA’s future challenges of ATF regulations.”

The National Rifle Association supported the case with an amicus curiae, or friend of the court, brief in Garland v. Cargill, a case where respondent Michael Cargill had purchased two bump stocks several months before the ATF published a final rule that amended the regulatory definition of “machinegun” to include bump stocks by adding the language: “The term ‘machine gun’ includes bump-stock devices, i.e., devices that allow a semiautomatic firearm to shoot more than one shot with a single pull of the trigger by harnessing the recoil energy of the semi-automatic firearm to which it is affixed so that the trigger resets and continues firing without additional physical manipulation of the trigger by the shooter.”

The final rule determined that owners of bump stocks had to divest themselves of the accessories by the effective date of March 26, 2019. On March 25, 2019, Cargill surrendered his bump stocks to the ATF, and on the same day, he filed suit in the Western District of Texas to challenge the rule. A bench trial ruled in favor of the ATF’s final rule, a judgement affirmed by a three-judge panel United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Following an additional argument, the en banc court reversed and remanded the judgement.

In April 2023, Attorney General Merrick Garland petitioned the United States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari, which was granted on November 3. Oral arguments were heard on Feb. 28, 2024.

Latest

Beretta 1301 A300 Comparison 1
Beretta 1301 A300 Comparison 1

Beretta's 1301 Tactical vs. A300 Ultima Patrol Shotguns: Which Should You Choose?

Ever since Beretta launched the A300 Ultima Patrol shotgun in 2024 as a less-pricey alternative to the 1301 Tactical, shotgunners have debated whether the 1301 is worth the extra cost. Let's examine them both.

ZEV Technologies Escaping Washington State’s Hostile Political Climate

ZEV Technologies announced it is moving its headquarters and manufacturing operations out of Washington state to Utah’s Second Amendment-friendly business climate.

U.S. v. Hemani Arguments

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. v. Hemani. The case involves a defendant who is fighting a federal indictment for possessing a firearm while being a marijuana user.

Will Canada Attempt a Door-to-Door Gun Confiscation?

Whether, after Oct. 30, 2026, the federal government in Canada will escalate to door-to-door confiscation or whether they will be forced in the courts and legislatures to confront the failure of a policy that trades liberty for an illusion of control remains to be seen.

Rifleman Review: Federal 7 mm Backcountry

Unlike other recent cartridge launches, the key to Federal Ammunition's 7 mm Backcountry wasn't just in the design of the cartridge but also the type of material used in its case construction.

Big Bite in a Small Package: The Henry Repeating Arms Bear's Leg

Henry Repeating Arms is stepping up its lever-action game with the addition of its Bear's Leg design, a tactical lever-action that provides power and versatility in a compact platform.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.