Suppressors: Taking the Bang Out of Shooting

by
posted on March 23, 2014
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
clip_sf_5699-354x200.jpg

In case you hadn’t noticed, guns are loud. Hearing loss is forever. Once it’s gone, it’s gone. And I’ll admit that I was not as careful as I should have been when younger. My wife calls me “Miracle Ear” more than she calls me Mark. That’s when I hear her at all.

Around 70 to 95 decibels is where the “risk” of damage starts to be a problem. Once you get above 100 dB, you are in the danger zone. You get to 140 dB, and you are going to have damage if you are not wearing hearing protection. Gunshots, according to a 1975 Rifleman article, start out around 143 dB with .22 Shorts, and the .458 Win. Mag. comes in at 174 dB. When I shoot rifles or pistols, I usually wear both ear plugs and muffs-especially if it’s on an indoor range. On the shotgun range, I wear one or the other, but usually a set with electronic amplification that cuts out when a loud noise occurs. You know, like a gunshot. The only time I don’t wear hearing protection when shooting is when I am using a suppressor.

Suppressors, often called silencers (though they do not make gunfire completely “silent”), reduce the decibels of a gunshot to levels that are safe-or at least less prone to damage-human hearing. Some are better than others, and some cost considerably more than others, with units ranging from a few hundred dollars to several thousand.

Think of a firearm suppressor as a muffler for your gun, much like your car or ATV has a muffler. Before the 1930s, it was considered good manners to have a suppressor. Theodore Roosevelt had one on his Model 1894 Winchester so as not to disturb the neighbors as he dispatched pests at his Sagamore Hill home.

Suppressors are covered under the National Firearms Act of 1934, and as such the paperwork necessary is much like that for legally obtaining a fully transferable machine gun. Unlike legal machine guns (the fully transferable number of which was frozen in 1986), new suppressors can be made by licensed manufactures and transferred to individuals through properly licensed dealers. According to BATFE data, as of April 2013 there were 494,452 suppressors legally registered in accordance with National Firearms Act in the United States, and that number continues to increase each year.

Suppressors are legal to own in 39 states, and many that allow their ownership also permit their use in hunting varmints or big game, depending on the state. If you live in one of the 11 states that do not permit their lawful ownership by law-abiding civilians, you are out of luck. In addition, you have to be a U.S. resident, at least 21 and qualified to own a firearm under federal and state law.

The journey to suppressor ownership starts with identifying the suppressor that’s most appropriate for you. Obviously, an effective suppressor for a .308 Win. rifle takes a lot more engineering than one for a .22 pistol and will typically cost more. After you have identified the right suppressor, you have to find a dealer licensed by BATFE to sell NFA items in your state. Not all FFLs carry suppressors as there’s an additional license required. If you’re bored yet, you should just skip to the hilarious yet informative parody video below, produced by Silencerco. I think it was voiced by the same guy who did my 8 mm driver’s education films in the '80s.

Most dealers that regularly do business in suppressors can help walk you through the process, and some actually inventory suppressors. But that doesn’t mean you can just buy one, pass a background check and leave with the can.

The process starts with the BATF Form 4. Dealers typically know exactly how the paperwork should be filled out. They’ve done it before. If you are applying as an individual, you must get the signature of your area’s Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO), as well as supplying two sets of the forms with two photographs and two fingerprint cards. Then you put the package together with a check for $200 and send it to the BATFE. This is for the “tax stamp,” literally, a $200 stamp that looks like it should go on an envelope, likely printed in 1934, that is affixed to your paperwork. Once you pass the BATFE’s background check and your forms are processed, they are shipped back to your dealer. Once the dealer has the paperwork back from BATFE, you fill out a Form 4473 at the dealer and the suppressor is transferred to you.

And be patient. I am told the process takes about a year at present from start to finish.

Latest

Resurgence Of 2
Resurgence Of 2

New Digital Surveillance Tools Threaten Gun Owner Privacy

Technology contained within new digital surveillance hardware recently introduced by defense contractor Leonardo could conceivably track who has recently purchased firearm and where they're taking it.

First Look: Shell Tech Ammo Dog Bowl

The materials used in your dog’s bowl matter for all the same reasons the materials in your own water bottle matter. That's why this dog bowl from Shell Tech Ammo is worth looking at.

Pony Power: Colt Launches Optics Division with VMR Riflescopes

Colt Optics grew out of a market where military, law enforcement and civilian customers increasingly expect a firearms manufacturer to offer a complete package that goes beyond just the firearm

The Mysterious Mondragón: Mexico's Unique Self-Loading Military Rifle

Flawed in many ways, the Model 1908 Mondragón offered a preview of infantry rifles to come. And the circumstances of the Mondragón’s birth showed that not all firearm innovation comes from the hallowed halls of Springfield, Colt, Mauser or Enfield. 

Meet an Australian Visiting America to Warn Us

Australian political commentator Topher Field has come to America on its 250th birthday to speak and meet people and to bring the message that Australia’s gun confiscation should not be used as a template for the United States.

NRA-ILA’s John Commerford on What’s to Come for America’s Rifle

When the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear two cases—Grant v. Higgins and Viramontes v. Cook County, Illinois—that challenge bans on popular semi-automatic rifles in its next term, fear and trepidation ran like tremors through the public statements of anti-gun groups and the politicians they support.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.