Reversed Rails

by
posted on March 26, 2014
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
wiley-clapp.jpg (2)

Rails are a common feature that we sort of take for granted in our semi-automatic pistols. In all but a few guns, the upper or so-called “top” end of a pistol is in the form of a slide. In order to allow the pistol to perform the namesake automatic reloading of the chamber, the slide moves back upon firing. This causes the gun mechanism to extract the fired round from the chamber and eject it from the gun. A powerful spring in the mechanism returns the slide to the forward (battery) position. In doing so, the mechanism feeds a cartridge from the magazine into the chamber and (usually) cocks the hammer (or striker). Now, it should be obvious that all of this complicated back-and-forth movement has to be controlled-exactly the same from shot to shot. On any gun that is worth a hoot, the movement of the slide on the receiver is controlled by the rails.

There are rails on both the upper edge of the receiver and the lower edge of the slide. In quality handguns, the fit of the two sets of rails is precise. There has to be enough room between the two to permit straight back and forth movement without lateral wiggling and binding. But there also needs to be enough room for the residue produced by firing the gun. I have seen pistols with the crud from firing thousands of rounds continue to function with an occasional squirt of oil. This is no credit to the shooter who can’t find the time to clean his gun, but great credit is due the designer/maker of the arm who did his job well. The rails have something to do with this. Most common service pistols arrange the rail system so the slide rail runs down and then in, as viewed from the rear of the gun-the matching receiver rail runs up and then out. In effect, this creates a system where the slide rides on the receiver. It has proven to be a system that is fairly easy to manufacture.

It is possible, however, to reverse the system and get a somewhat better performance. Here, the receiver rail runs up and in, vice versa for the slide rail. Reversing the rail orientation means that the slide, riding in the receiver, is a little better supported. Charles Petter, a Swiss by birth and an officer of the French Foreign Legion in World War I, designed a reversed rail system. It is seen on today’s SIG P210, probably the most accurate military service pistol in the world. A more common gun that also has this rail system is the CZ75, as well as that gun’s many clones. I used to be extremely enthused about this way of building an auto, but then discovered that it was hard to work the slide under stress or when wearing gloves.

Latest

Wilson Combat Bulwark 01
Wilson Combat Bulwark 01

Beyond the 1911: Wilson Combat's New Bulwark

The Bulwark is designed as a “hard-use service pistol” that combines the best features of a 1911 with those of a daily-carry duty gun, and Wilson Combat delivers it all at a price point below Wilson’s traditional handgun offerings.

Rifleman Review: Walther Arms PDP Pro-X PMM

Recently, Walther Arms has combined several PDP feature sets with a Parker Mountain Machine compensator to produce the Pro-X PMM.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) just opened an investigation to “determine whether Philadelphia Police use a vague ‘good cause’ standard to cancel permits to carry legal firearms.”

Review: Smith & Wesson M&P FPC 5.7

Having more guns chambered in 5.7 mm is a great thing, and the Smith & Wesson M&P FPC 5.7 is a welcome addition to the growing world of 5.7 mm firearms.

Ruger Moves HQ to North Carolina

Ruger quietly relocated its corporate headquarters from Southport, Conn., to Mayodan, N.C., marking the end of the company's management presence in the town where it was founded in 1949.

Honest EDC: A Realistic Assessment of Your Concealed Carry Kit

The problem is not that most concealed-carry loadouts are bad. The problem is that most concealed-carry kits are never re-examined against reality.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.