The Keefe Report: Glock’s MHS Pistols Unveiled

by
posted on June 27, 2017
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
glock_mhs_19_lede.jpg

In the words of Connor MacLeod, "There can be only one." That line, of course, is from the 1986 movie “Highlander,” and may or may not have resulted in my godson’s name choice. Regardless, when it comes to the Modular Handgun System (MHS) trial to determine the next service pistol for the U.S. Army, it would appear that a version of the SIG Sauer P320 that will eventually wear the U.S. M17 name.


 

The most recent piece of news regarding the MHS was that the protest filed with the Government Accounting Office by Glock, Inc., had been denied. In a post I wrote about the GAO announcement on June 5, there was quite an uproar on why Glock’s protest was denied. The protest was, of course, anticipated, and they happen on just about every big government contract from fighter jets to galoshes. While the GAO gave some of its reasons, it did not stop the speculation on social media, which included assertions that Glock did not meet the requirements of the Army’s RFP. That is a supposition firmly denied by Glock.

Here’s an example of the online backlash: “First. The Glock was not 100% modular. Second, the Glock did not have the REQUIRED manual safety and Glock refused to install one.”




In another comment, the following questions, too, were raised: “Did the military change the requirements? I thought they required a manual safety? Or was this why it was denied.” There were more, many more. And some expletives may have been involved.

According to statement from Glock's Vice President of Operations Josh Dorsey, "GLOCK, Inc. met or exceeded all of the mandated threshold requirements set forth in the RFP by the Army." Glock has some folks that know their way around the government contracting system, and there is no way they would whiff on a thumb safety.

Images have been obtained of the actual Glocks made for the MHS trials. Despite speculation, the MHS guns were not a G17 or G22, they were actually a G19 in 9x19 mm and a G23 in .40 S&W—and if you look, there are no finger grooves on the frame. Also, no threaded barrel version is pictured in the accompanying images, but like the extended magazines shown, there would have been such barrels to meet the RFP’s requirements. SIG Sauer has not been releasing images of its threaded muzzles, either. It is unknown if Glock submitted both 9 mm and .40 S&W versions at this time.

While there is no chassis and shell (which kept Glock outside of Steyr’s patent, a story for another time), current Glocks offer the firm’s MBS or Modular Backstrap System, allowing some accommodation for hand size. There do not appear to be any replaceable side panels. Whether the Army considered the frame with MBS versatile enough is unknown. Interestingly, if you look closely you will see a lanyard loop on the base of the grip frame. Clever.

The Glock pistols submitted for the trial had some features unfamiliar to most of the Austrian maker’s pistols. In particular there is a bilateral thumb safety included on the frame behind the slide lock. On the left side it is a shallow paddle, but on the right side it a lever that extends from the recess at the back of the frame for the mechanism housing pin. Again, clever.

I have been told that Glock has no immediate plans to offer an MHS version of the G19 pistol, but now that I have had a look at it, I think it is something that would appeal to quite a few shooters.

When it comes to the actual U.S. Army contract, Connor MacLeod was right. But, other makers that vied for the XM17 have introduced a new generation of commercial sidearms with much appeal for the shooting public. The FN 509 is already available and was covered here, and the Beretta APX pistol is on dealer shelves.

Who knows what Glock’s management is thinking, but perhaps it would be nice were a G19 MHS to appear on the shelves next to its fellow MHS competitors. I must say I find the bilateral thumb safety version of the G19 the most interesting Glock development since the rollout of the G42.

Additional Reading:

In Your Eyes: Glock MHS Protest Rejected 
Army XM17 MHS Pistol: It's Happening
 
U.S. XM17 MHS: It's the Hollow Points, Stupid  
MHS Update: Glock Protests SIG Sauer Result
  

Beretta Introduces the APX   
Winchester Named Ammo Supplier for the U.S. Army MHS Program  
NRA Gun Gear of the Week: U.S. Army’s New Pistol  
The Keefe Report: I Was Wrong About the XM17  
The Keefe Report: SIG Sauer Wins U.S. Army XM17 Modular Handgun System (MHS) Contract
The Keefe Report: ProvenThe FN America 509 Pistol   
FN America Launches MHS Entry: The 509 9mm Pistol  

 

Latest

Building an AR-15 lower receiver
Building an AR-15 lower receiver

Review: Assembling an AR-15 Lower Receiver

Building a high-quality AR-15 starts with selecting appropriate components.

Suppressors Deregulated in South Dakota

In a move anticipating a further reduction of restrictions, South Dakota has removed the law requiring the Federal stamp.

The Pursuit Of Increased Muzzle Velocity Comes With A Price

The quest to make our firearms’ projectiles move downrange at ever higher velocities cuts across multiple shooting pursuits and predates anyone alive today.

Review: Springfield Armory Hellcat .380 Pistol

Springfield Armory just released its popular Hellcat double-stack, striker-fired pistol in .380 ACP, and it might be an ideal option for armed citizens looking for a soft-shooting handgun for concealed carry.

New for 2026: Langdon Tactical Technology Beretta Cheetah Pistol

Beretta's .32 ACP Cheetah gets the Langdon Tactical upgrade package.

The Armed Citizen® Feb. 16, 2026

Read today's "The Armed Citizen" entry for real stories of law-abiding citizens, past and present, who used their firearms to save lives.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.