Book Review—The War on Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies

posted on December 13, 2016
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
book.jpg

While attacks on the Second Amendment are all-too common in today’s politically charged climate, advocates fighting for our right to self-defense and the right to bear arms now have a powerful new tool in The War On Guns: Arming Yourself Against Gun Control Lies, the latest book by John R. Lott Jr.

Lott, who holds a doctoral degree in economics and has established himself as a peerless investigator on the topics of gun use and gun rights, once again provides decisive analysis and careful research of current studies and government data to prove there really is an effort to limit, if not completely remove, firearms from the hands of the American public. Roughly two-thirds of the book is centered on analytic proof and commentary that gives backbone to Lott’s thesis that a concerted campaign is being waged by politicians and bureaucrats with gun-control agendas. Impressively, and as any serious study should include on such a broad topic, there are two appendices of data and an extensive set of footnotes citing every source Lott mentions in his textual analysis. There is also an index for more specific topics.

What makes this book unique among pro-gun and pro-Second Amendment rights-related tomes is the detailed chapter-by-chapter breakdown of the many lies and obfuscations pushed by influential anti-gun figures. Lott corroborates contradictory data from various sources, including analyses and studies he has (in full disclosure) conducted himself. What’s more, the author is actually able to break down the anti-gunners’ arguments by citing their own data. To further expose the often-corrupt motives behind gun-banners’ data manipulation and silencing of those who challenge their intentions, Lott recounts several instances of media and academic bias, if not blatant censorship, from his own attempts to build public awareness of actual facts supporting self-defense and gun ownership.

Whatever the specific issue, readers will be able to find a relevant chapter to enhance their understanding of what’s really at stake. Topics include: how academics and the media distort facts; how public health officials, the CDC and physicians have failed to produce sufficient proof, cause or correlation to determine that firearms are a detriment to people’s well-being; and how Stand Your Ground laws and background checks have real world applications and ramifications on everyday law-abiding citizens. Lott dedicates three chapters specifically to how the U.S. compares to other countries. He dedicates an entire chapter to Australia and whether that nation’s gun control initiatives have workedhint: they haven’t. The most chilling of his conclusions is that an obvious collaboration between factions in government, media and academia is attempting to control public discourse by distorting facts to meet expected outcomes.

Lott has accomplished the difficult task of collecting, consuming, analyzing and disseminating hundreds, if not thousands, of pieces of research to give readers and advocates hard numbers to present in debate or discourse. As such, readers might find it challenging to pore through such a wealth of statistics and data, though the text is articulately written. Lott peppers the chapters with tables and line graphs to better illustrate where the data is and where it clearly doesn’t support the left’s assertions. The author also highlights biases in the collection of data and study methodology, either because of the failings of the data, in how the data was poorly sampled or how it was manipulated by those conducting the studies. It is a heroic effort to show that good guys with guns do make a difference while also condemning those who purposely mislead or misdirect those seeking the truth.

John R. Lott Jr., $27.99, hardcover, 256 pages, Regnery Publishing, regnery.com

 

Latest

Beretta 1301 A300 Comparison 1
Beretta 1301 A300 Comparison 1

Beretta's 1301 Tactical vs. A300 Ultima Patrol Shotguns: Which Should You Choose?

Ever since Beretta launched the A300 Ultima Patrol shotgun in 2024 as a less-pricey alternative to the 1301 Tactical, shotgunners have debated whether the 1301 is worth the extra cost. Let's examine them both.

ZEV Technologies Escaping Washington State’s Hostile Political Climate

ZEV Technologies announced it is moving its headquarters and manufacturing operations out of Washington state to Utah’s Second Amendment-friendly business climate.

U.S. v. Hemani Arguments

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. v. Hemani. The case involves a defendant who is fighting a federal indictment for possessing a firearm while being a marijuana user.

Will Canada Attempt a Door-to-Door Gun Confiscation?

Whether, after Oct. 30, 2026, the federal government in Canada will escalate to door-to-door confiscation or whether they will be forced in the courts and legislatures to confront the failure of a policy that trades liberty for an illusion of control remains to be seen.

Rifleman Review: Federal 7 mm Backcountry

Unlike other recent cartridge launches, the key to Federal Ammunition's 7 mm Backcountry wasn't just in the design of the cartridge but also the type of material used in its case construction.

Big Bite in a Small Package: The Henry Repeating Arms Bear's Leg

Henry Repeating Arms is stepping up its lever-action game with the addition of its Bear's Leg design, a tactical lever-action that provides power and versatility in a compact platform.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.