NRA Gun Gear of the Week: Shield v. Shield—Conclusion

by
posted on August 20, 2017

Having addressed the sights, trigger and recoil management qualities of a standard 9-mm M&P Shield, it made sense to pit the project gun against the Performance Center Shield in head-to-head shooting match. The 50-round course of fire included drills chosen to test speed—from the holster and shot-to-shot—accuracy, strong- and weak-hand-only performance, and target-to-target transitions. The results were quite satisfying. 

Regarding the sights, American Rifleman's Joe Kurtenbach found that he was consistently a touch faster—one- or two-tenths of a second—with the project gun, thanks to the big, bright front sight which was very easy to pick up and put on target. However, accuracy was just a little bit better with the Performance Center model, that gun’s finer front sight yielded tighter groups and one less “miss” during the 50-round test—for most of the drills 2” bullseyes were used, and any shot outside the bull was considered a miss. 

The triggers on both guns were a revelation. Both were smooth on the pull, crisp at the break, and featured short resets that were clearly denoted by tactile and audible cues. The Apex Tactical trigger was noticeably lighter, and definitely added some flair, but both triggers performed very well, and both were clear upgrades over the stock bang-switch of the standard Shield. Shot-to-shot split times were virtually identical with both guns, illustrating just how evenly matched the two upgraded pistols are. 

Another factor to consider when looking at shot-to-shot splits is the overall shootability and recoil management of a given firearm. Based on the shot timer, and the feel in hand, here again the guns are evenly matched and, again, both are improvements over the base model. The PC’s ported barrel and slide performed as intended, counter-acting the effects of recoil and reducing muzzle rise. The project gun’s Talon grips provided excellent purchase, really anchoring the small gun in hand and allowing the shooter’s grip to better control the gun’s movement when firing.

All in all, Kurtenbach reports that both guns were a lot of fun to shoot—a sentiment not commonly associated with full-power sub-compact semi-autos.

For more commentary and conclusions from the Shield v. Shield project, including a price and value comparison, watch this week's NRA Gun Gear of the Week video above.

Additional Reading:

NRA Gun Gear of the Week: Shield v. Shield—Concept
NRA Gun Gear of the Week: Shield v. Shield—Sights
NRA Gun Gear of the Week: Shield v. Shield—Trigger
NRA Gun Gear of the Week: Shield v. Shield—Recoil

 

Latest

NRA Logo On Blue
NRA Logo On Blue

2024 NRA Board of Directors Election Results

The National Rifle Association is pleased to announce the results of the 2024 elections for the NRA Board of Directors.

 

Review: Rossi R95 Triple Black In .30-30 Win.

This version of a classically styled lever-action sports a tactical makeover for modern lever-gun fans. 

C&H Precision Earns "Large Business Of The Year" Award

Georgia’s Richmond Hill Chamber of Commerce votes C&H Precision as “Large Business of the Year.”

Rifleman Review: Springfield Armory Hellcat Pro

Springfield Armory's Hellcat Pro is taller, longer and heavier than the company's original Hellcat, but these dimensional increases actually do a lot to benefit the armed citizen.

Bill Ruger’s Prototype Rifle

Ruger may be celebrating its 75th anniversary in 2024, but the first firearm designed and built by William Batterman Ruger, the semi-automatic Savage Model 99 conversion seen to the left, came some 10 years before the Standard Model debuted in 1949.

Windham Weaponry Back In Business

On April 19, Windham Weaponry announced it is back in business, although a company spokesman confirmed the effort to re-open began Jan. 1.

Interests



Get the best of American Rifleman delivered to your inbox.